Newsroom

News Articles

Apr 12 2013

Democrats converge this weekend in Sacramento at their annual state convention, in part to celebrate their successes in the 2012 elections.

I don’t want to spoil the party, but Democratic leaders need to do more to elect women to public office, starting in 2014.

Here are some red flag statistics that warrant immediate attention.

State Legislature

Since 2003, the number of women in the 80-member State Assembly decreased from 25 to 21.  Democratic women decreased from 20 to 14, while Republican women increased from 5 to 7.

In the 40-member State Senate, the number of Democratic women decreased by 3 – from 11 of 11 women members a decade ago to 8 of 10 in 2013.

The percentage of women of color decreased from 44% of women legislators in 2003 to 32% in 2013.  During this period:

  • African American women increased from 0 to 3 in the Assembly, but continue to have no representation in the State Senate.
  • Latinas decreased from 6 to 5 in the State Assembly, and lost all representation in the State Senate, going from 6 members to 0 (yes, 0).
  • Asian-Pacific Islander (API) women decreased from 4 to 1 in the State Assembly and increased from 0 to 1 in the upper house.

Congress

There are currently 18 women in our 53-member delegation to the House of Representatives, all Democrats. Ten years ago, 18 women also served; 17 were Democrats.

Progress to parity is also achingly slow at the national level.  Women serving in the 435-member U.S. House of Representatives increased from 60 in 2003 (39 Democrats and 21 Republicans) to 77 women (58 Democrats and 19 Republicans) in 2013.

Locally Elected Offices

While local offices are not partisan, they are typically seen as the farm team that prepares officeholders to run for higher office.

Currently, 17 of California’s 58 counties do not have a single woman serving on their Boards of Supervisors, and another 21 have only 1 (all counties in California have 5-member Boards, except San Francisco, which has 11 members).

Is the paucity of locally elected women in these 38 counties due solely to a lack of support for women candidates or Democrats?  No – in 19 of these counties at least 50% of the voters supported U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein in the 2012 General Election, and a majority of voters in 17 counties supported President Barack Obama.

Overall, 54 of California’s 58 counties have male majorities on their Boards of Supervisors – which makes the political farm team in California look a lot like professional baseball.

Why bother electing more women to office?

Not only do more women in public office tip the scales of representation toward parity, women in public office often take the lead on legislation affecting women and children.  Here in California, women legislators have championed child care, pay equity, paid family leave and sick days, poverty prevention programs for single parents, women in the military, and women’s health.

There needs to be more discussion about why the rate of electing women seems to have stalled out in California.

Experts point to many reasons, including a culture of partisanship in Sacramento that turns women off to politics; more women in the workforce who have less time to build a political resumé; and term limits, which have created a revolving door that helps some women move up to higher office but forces others to simply move on.

Some studies show that redistricting can limit opportunities for women to run for public office.

Questions might also be raised about the Party’s priorities.  While Democratic leaders over the past 10 years have had many political challenges – electing a governor, dealing with budget deficits, and battling anti-union initiatives – let’s hope a commitment to parity has not been permanently sidelined.

And while it may be a political third-rail to state this publicly, some women’s organizations need to hit the “refresh button,” and step up targeting and support for women candidates, as well as coordination with other organizations.

Finally, there’s what we can now call the lean-in factor.  Women can’t win if they don’t run.  And women can’t run unless they step up and take the risk – personally, professionally, and politically.

But let’s be very clear:  Getting more women elected will take more than beefed-up feminine willpower.

It will take the resources, commitment and strategic know-how of many leaders – and Democrats this weekend have the opportunity to assess these red flag statistics and begin working to elect more women in 2014.

 

Author:  Kate Karpilow

Note: Statistics in this article were compiled from many sources, including the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University (cawp.rutgers.edu), California Women Lead (cawomenlead.org), and the Office of the California Secretary of State (sos.ca.gov).

Apr 8 2013

At 30-years old, I hit a metaphorical wall.  I was exhausted and burned-out.  A social entrepreneur, I had poured my whole self into the venture I began at 24-years old and it seemed there was nothing left of me, for me.  I had a hard time getting to sleep.  I cried a lot.  I was broke.

I looked for role models, for other feminists who had dedicated their lives to changing the world by leading organizations to see how they did it.  I saw just two choices.  Either I could keep going, personal sacrifices be dammed, and find myself an old, bitter lady fighting the same battles year after year, with increasing exasperation and exhaustion. Or, I could quit and find something less taxing and also, less meaningful. I thought this was a false choice. I wanted a third-way, a path where I could be a leader with a joyful heart and a full life.

I set out to make that path. You might say, I leaned in to the challenge.

I got a coach.  The first thing Belma González helped me to do was to think about taking a serious break. Then she helped me ask for one from my organization’s board of directors.  I was granted a three-month paid sabbatical. While that break served many goals, including my own wellbeing and improving the capacity of the organization, the biggest leadership lesson of all was in The Ask.

Asking for a sabbatical was the first time in my professional life that I made a big, bold, no compromises-kind-of -ask for me. At the time it was the riskiest thing I’d ever done.  It was more scary than the first time I soloed an airplane at age 16 or when I moved to Alaska from the sunny beaches of Southern California on my own at 18-years. The board’s decision was out of my control. I have never been so nervous and so liberated at the same time.

Over the course of several months, before, during and after my sabbatical, I changed.  I saw how The Ask made me better: a more effective leader, activist and entrepreneur. I was ready to do more asking, more leading, more leaning in. I became more conscious about my decisions – what I was saying yes to and what I was saying no – especially about how I invested my time.  I started saying no to meeting-up with peers to commiserate over how tired and overwhelmed we were. I stopped going to meetings that didn’t interest me.  I stopped complaining and gossiping. I asked my colleagues not to tell me the next time they heard a nasty rumor spread about me, or my organization.  I said no to being stuck.

I said yes to moving forward. I found mentors who had overcome challenges. I studied the habits of successful people. I worked with coaches fromCompassPoint Nonprofit Services, including Michelle Gislason and Rich Snowdon, who helped me identify my strengths. I surrounded myself with others who were motivated and ambitious too. I did what all successful people tell you to do: I dropped what was holding me back and stepped forward.

The result? My life got a lot harder and the decisions more complex. I faced more risks, more ambiguity, and more obstacles.  But following the status quo was no longer an option, because I was out to change the standards.

As my organization grew and benefitted from my revitalized leadership I could offer others opportunities for leadership.  I watched over and over as passionate, smart and talented young women stopped themselves from stepping into the unknowns of leadership. When I tried to talk about the phenomena, I was told the problem was mine, not theirs. My standards were too high. My ambition too strong. I should expect less.

It reminded me of the advice I got as a teenage girl looking for love: “you shouldn’t act so smart” I was told.  It was bad advice then and it’s bad advice now.  Even worse, these messages didn’t come from men.  They came from feminists.  The message was that in order for others to be more, I had to be less.  I reject that false choice too.

I started paying attention to Sheryl Sandberg long before her TED talk because I pay attention to people who succeed, especially those who break a barrier, be it gender or race. I regularly read “Corner Office” – the conversation on management and leadership – in the business section of the New York Times.  I have no real interest in fashion or music, but I soak up every article about the ways designers and artists bring their uncompromised visions to the world.  The band U2 is my leadership idol for their ability to stay together, adapt and grow with the times.

On the advice of my coaches, I read Seth Godin and other business guys, likeJim Collins and Marcus Buckingham, who taught me what no feminist leader ever did: I have immeasurable strengths and talents. I shouldn’t worry about being liked, or right. I should surround myself with people who believe in me and share my passion. It’s my duty to create what is most in my heart and deliver my creative vision to the world as my gift.  For the life of me, I can’t understand why these are not the dominant themes of the feminist message on women’s leadership.

When I watched Sheryl’s TED talk, I heard her put a name to what I had seen.  If she had seen women stop themselves at Facebook – at the place it seems everyone wants to work – just as in my own organization, there was something unspoken happening. I am also a woman, working in a field dominated by women and my venture is a nonprofit organization. I wasn’t fighting to make my way in a field of men.  There were barely any men around.

In the conversations that have followed the launch of her book, she was accused of not representing the average working mother. That’s true. She doesn’t. “Lean in” is a book for leaders – the public kind, leaders operating on a big stage with responsibilities for the wellbeing of people, organizations, economies and nation-states – and as everyone knows, leadership has serious costs.  No family leave policy or flexible work schedule in the world will take them away.  That’s why so many people – women and men – don’t put themselves out there.  Leadership is vulnerable.  It’s risky and hard.

But, there is nothing in the history of women’s lives throughout the world to tell us that we are not up for the challenge. We are. But what’s missing from this new conversation on women’s leadership is discussion on the inevitable rewards. No, I’m not referring to the monetary ones, or even the representation-type rewards, where it’s assumed having more women in positions of power will benefit all women.  We don’t know that’s true.  Women aren’t just one group – we come from many communities and we hold different values and beliefs about women and work.  The rewards of leadership are far deeper, and they can be immensely more personal.

It’s hard to put into words the satisfaction I gain from having a purpose.  I am motivated by the need to have an impact, to change the world, and I know I do.  I can connect words I have spoken and actions I have taken with real life results that have made people’s lives better. I am deeply grateful for the opportunities I have to turn ideas into action.

I have found comfort in the ambiguity and challenges of leadership and I have developed the confidence and resilience that leaders achieve only with time and experience. I have a lot left in me these days – for work, leadership and life. I sleep well. I laugh just as much as I cry. I make a good living.

When I see young people passionate about changing the world yet afraid of the costs of leading, I want to share the good news about what’s possible on the other side – the rewards that come with the risks. I want to encourage them to leave the commiserating and complaining behind and embrace the scary-exhilaration of leadership. I don’t want them to worry too much about all the times they will undoubtedly fall short, get told “no” and fail. They must keep going, learning, adapting, finding their passion and their purpose. I hope they develop the skills, experience and wisdom the world so desperately needs and can only receive from them. They will be challenged beyond belief. It will not be easy. But, it can be meaningful and rewarding – for the leader, her family and the world.

What hurts my heart is that somehow this message may not be enough. I fear this good news won’t be heard unless I somehow convince them that I’m just as happy in my personal life as I am satisfied in my public one. Do I need to prove that I am not a slave to the cause and that I have perfect balance in order for my experience to be worthy of their notice?

It’s been 7-years since I hit that wall. I am the same person but a remarkably better leader.  I continue down the third path of leadership – the one where I never quit but I also don’t make the sacrifices that will leave me bitter. My organization has become a source of fuel and fire to me, not a vacuum sucking me dry. I enjoy my work, my team and what we create together. I watch women lean in every day. They inspire me. Everyday I get clearer about what I’m saying no to and what I say yes to and sometimes, my needs change. I am capable of adjusting to new realities. I have learned to let go of what I can’t control.  That doesn’t mean I haven’t fallen hard.  You bet I have. But, as a leader, staying down is never an option.

I have the will to lead.  I bet you do too.

Jan 28 2013

Sandra Fluke

by Don Hazen at 12:35 pm
January 27, 2013

 

I flew across the country from freezing NYC to sunny, not so cold Oakland on Saturday just in time to pop into a reception for one of my favorite groups Emerge California , who's goal it is to get more Democratic, pro-choice women elected to public office.  Ever since I managed Ruth Messinger's campaign in NYC to help get her elected to the NY City Council in the late '70s, I've known that women in office often improve our legislatures.  But we are sadly lacking in the number of women elected at every level of government.

Sandra Fluke, famous for being pathetically attacked by Rush Limbaugh for advocating for access to contraception, was at the event, at the Den at the Fox Theatre, and made a funny point -- she noted that there was some progress in the past election for women in office.so much that we are now ranked 79th in the world up from 80. She dryly suggested there is some room for improvement.

During Saturday 25 women participated in an Emerge training to prepare them for the big decision to run, what it entails, and the essential ingredients for success.  Dynamic Oakland City Council member Libby Schaaf cheekily offered the encouragement that she ran for office with two toddlers and that you don't get disqualified if your petitions include traces of baby vomit.  Trainees will graduate in June, and Emerge’s dynamic leader Kimberly Ellis told the audience to make their calendars for Emerge’s big fundraiser on May 2nd in San Francisco.

California Assemblywomen Nancy Skinner proudly told the large, very diverse, energetic audience that California is one of the few states where there has been no back sliding on reproductive rights, in fact a small expansion.  This suggests that men in office aren't always bad. Despite the fact, that Democrats hold virtual super majorities in the California legislature, the percentage of women is only 28.3 %, showing that the Democrat party isn’t all that much better than Republicans for recruiting and ensuring that there is something close to gender parity in Sacramento. That is why Emerge is so important.

The percent of women in state legislatures cross the country is quite depressing actually  --Colorado is the highest with 40%, while the majority of legislatures have women represented under the 30% level and a number under 20%, the lowest being South Carolina with 10% followed closely by Louisiana with 11%.   

As Fluke said, there is some room for improvement.

 

 

Don Hazen, Executive Editor,

AlterNet.org

Executive Director, Independent Media Institute

Jun 10 2012

Emerge is more than a credential, it is a credo. To emerge is to climb ever higher, ever stronger, ever better able to represent our aspirations and to bring others along with us. To achieve the California Dream, the American Dream of liberty and justice for all, we need full representation of women in leadership and elected office.

Jun 1 2012

As her daughters, ages 10 and 3, swirl in and out of their Oakland kitchen, looking for Ovaltine and peanut butter, Joanne Karchmer says of the recent spate of attacks on women’s rights, "It’s been so astounding lately. I don’t ever remember a time in my life where I felt quite as challenged and looked forward and said, ‘What is this going to look like for my daughters?’"

May 25 2012

The War Against Women has been has had an easy ride to an early victory for the Misogynists of America. The number of women in office has suffered a serious drop in recent times. In many places like Orange County, California, political machines do their best to undermine women who even consider running for office.

May 25 2012

In 2002, a group of passionate San Francisco Bay Area women founded Emerge California with the goal of placing more Democratic women into political office. Emerge California is part of a national movement aiming to address the underrepresentation of women in elected offices in the U.S. Ten years after its inception, this program is still the only organization in the state (and one of only two in the country) providing Democratic female politicians with the comprehensive training they need to seek public office and win.

May 7 2012

There is a sneaky initiative on the November ballot that would put California on its way to higher poverty and lower wages. Dubbed the "Stop Special Interest Money Now Act," this initiative could increase the number of uninsured workers, double the wage gap, and cut your annual income by almost $6,000.

Apr 7 2012

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency would like to work toward balancing its budget by extending meters on evenings and to Sundays. Not only is this a regressive and backward thought process, it will create collateral consequences for everyone. Policies that are based solely on the idea of creating revenue are always unwise.

Put Yourself On The Ballot

Learn about the Emerge program, how to apply and get connected to our Council of Allies

Join Our Movement

Thanks for your interest in Emerge California.  To stay informed about the Emerge program and upcoming events, please provide the best contact information below.

Contact Information
Address
Interests

Support Our Work

Emerge California needs your help to expand our training.